The truth – decline of the nuclear industry

We have heard from the nuclear lobby that a “nuclear renaissance” is just around the corner and, as evidence of this, we are told 65 reactors are “under construction” worldwide.

It is instructive to look at the number of years some of these have been “under construction”. For example, Lungmen 1 and 2 in China were begun in 1997 and have so far taken 15 years to build.

Moving from the disappointing to the ludicrous, Watts Bar 2 in the US has been ”under construction” since 1972. It is likely these long-delayed projects will eventually be cancelled, and almost certainly they will never be an economic success. 

countries in the “considering” list is a distortion of the facts by the World Nuclear Association, perhaps born of a desperation to conceal the decline of the industry.

 Nuclear industry ‘rebirth’ is instead stillborn http://www.businessday.co.za/articles/Content.aspx?id=176811 The sad truth is that even according to the optimistic International Atomic Energy Agency data from the PRIS data, the number of reactors on which construction was started fell 75% from 2010 to last year, and again 75% from last year to this year PETER BECKER   2012/07/23 07

THE nuclear power industry is deeply troubled, with little cause for optimism. There is growing worldwide
public resistance to nuclear power stations, US President Barack Obama has terminated government subsidies for nuclear power, and Germany and Switzerland have committed to shutting down all their reactors. While the renewable energy industry has seen dramatic growth and constantly falling costs, the nuclear industry grapples with spiralling costs, the seemingly intractable waste-disposal issue, and the huge economic and human costs of the Fukushima nuclear disaster in Japan.

We have heard from the nuclear lobby that a “nuclear renaissance” is just around the corner and, as evidence of this, we are told 65 reactors are “under construction” worldwide. Examination of this list reveals some interesting details. The International Atomic Energy
Association maintains a database of all commercial reactors, the Power
Reactor Information System (PRIS). In March this year, it listed 65
reactors as “under construction”.
It is instructive to look at the number of years some of these have been “under construction”. For example, Lungmen 1 and 2 in China were begun in 1997 and have so far taken 15 years to build. In the Slovak
Republic, construction of Mochovce 3 and 4 was started in 1987, making
25 years so far. For Atucha 2 in Argentina, it’s 31 years. Moving from the disappointing to the ludicrous, Watts Bar 2 in the US has been ”under construction” since 1972. It is likely these long-delayed projects will eventually be cancelled, and almost certainly they will never be an economic success. Even if they are ever completed, the
designs will be frighteningly outdated and their safety features
unlikely to satisfy current regulatory requirements or public
concerns. It is therefore disingenuous to include these in a list of
“success stories” about nuclear power. Eliminating the reactors that
have been “under construction” for 15 years or more reduces the list
of 65 to 52.

Another item in the PRIS data is the estimated start-up year. It is
interesting that for many of these reactors across South Korea, India,
France, Brazil and China, the PRIS database does not list an estimated
start-up year. It is unusual, to say the least, for a construction
project to have no estimated completion date. This can be interpreted
as either a lack of commitment to the project or a sign that problems
have arisen that will delay construction. These can hardly be
considered success stories and eliminating them from the list of 52
reactors leaves just 10 reactors.

Of these 10, most are in pairs and they are spread over six different
nuclear plants. And of these plants, only two (Vogtle in the US and
Flamville in France) are in the West. What is more, Vogtle is likely
to be the last nuclear plant built in the US and was viable only
because of subsidies from the Bush administration.

Another statistic offered by the World Nuclear Association is that
nuclear power is being “considered” by 45 countries that do not
currently use it. At first glance, this seems to be impressive
evidence of the nuclear “renaissance”. However, any country that is
considering using nuclear power is, by definition of the word
“considering”, also considering not using it.
An analysis of the 45 countries reveals interesting examples. It
includes Namibia and Mongolia, which both consume about 3000GWh a
year. A small nuclear power station such as Koeberg, if operated at
80% capacity, would produce more than 12000 GWh a year. Is it likely
any country will pay for generating capacity that will produce more
than four times the electricity they need? Including these countries in the “considering” list is a distortion of the facts by the World Nuclear Association, perhaps born of a desperation to conceal the decline of the industry.

Nuclear power plants are very long-term commitments. It is therefore
important to have a healthy global nuclear industry in place so that
services such as maintenance, spare parts, decontamination after a
leak, plant decommissioning and waste handling are available at
reasonable prices when they are required, decades from now.

The sad truth is that even according to the optimistic International
Atomic Energy Agency data from the PRIS data, the number of reactors
on which construction was started fell 75% from 2010 to last year, and
again 75% from last year to this year. Far from a renaissance, this is
a catastrophic collapse. SA would do well to wait a few years to see
if this trend reverses before locking itself into the nuclear energy
option.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: